Hong Kong vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
Hong Kong
45 days
in 2019
New Zealand
42 days
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
187th
New Zealand rank
189th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- Hong Kong
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 45 days against 42 days in New Zealand, a difference of 3 days.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 187th and New Zealand ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Hong Kong or New Zealand?
- Hong Kong, at 45 days against 42 days in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Hong Kong and New Zealand?
- 3 days, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- Hong Kong ranks 187th and New Zealand ranks 189th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.