Ecuador vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
Ecuador
120 days
in 2019
Malaysia
120 days
in 2019
Ecuador rank
121st
Malaysia rank
121st
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 120 days against 120 days in Malaysia, a difference of 0 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 121st and Malaysia ranks 121st of 188 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Ecuador, at 120 days against 120 days in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 0 days, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- Ecuador ranks 121st and Malaysia ranks 121st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.