China vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment

China
240 days
in 2019
Sri Lanka
256 days
in 2019
China rank
49th
Sri Lanka rank
47th

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time

  • China
  • Sri Lanka
0100200300201120152019

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 256 days against 240 days in China, a difference of 16 days.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

China ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 47th of 188 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, China or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 256 days against 240 days in China as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between China and Sri Lanka?
16 days, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sri Lanka?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do China and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
China ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 47th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.