China vs Croatia: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment

China
240 days
in 2019
Croatia
235 days
in 2019
China rank
49th
Croatia rank
50th

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time

  • China
  • Croatia
050100150200250201120152019

How they compare

China currently reports 240 days against 235 days in Croatia, a difference of 5 days.

Across all 9 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 49th and Croatia ranks 50th of 188 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, China or Croatia?
China, at 240 days against 235 days in Croatia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between China and Croatia?
5 days, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Croatia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do China and Croatia rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
China ranks 49th and Croatia ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.