Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
Chile
180 days
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
180 days
in 2019
Chile rank
71st
Papua New Guinea rank
71st
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- Chile
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Chile currently reports 180 days against 180 days in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 71st and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Chile or Papua New Guinea?
- Chile, at 180 days against 180 days in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Chile and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 days, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- Chile ranks 71st and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.