Chile vs Eritrea: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment

Chile
180 days
in 2019
Eritrea
180 days
in 2019
Chile rank
71st
Eritrea rank
71st

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time

  • Chile
  • Eritrea
050100150200201120152019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 180 days against 180 days in Eritrea, a difference of 0 days.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 71st and Eritrea ranks 71st of 188 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Chile or Eritrea?
Chile, at 180 days against 180 days in Eritrea as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Chile and Eritrea?
0 days, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eritrea?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Chile and Eritrea rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
Chile ranks 71st and Eritrea ranks 71st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.