Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3.4%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
3.5%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th
Timor-Leste rank
96th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 3.5% against 3.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th and Timor-Leste ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 3.5% against 3.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Timor-Leste?
- 0.1%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th and Timor-Leste ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.