New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
New Zealand
3.2%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
3.5%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
99th
Timor-Leste rank
96th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- New Zealand
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 3.5% against 3.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 99th and Timor-Leste ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 3.5% against 3.2% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 0.3%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- New Zealand ranks 99th and Timor-Leste ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.