New Zealand vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
New Zealand
3.2%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3.4%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
99th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- New Zealand
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 3.4% against 3.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 99th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, New Zealand or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 3.4% against 3.2% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between New Zealand and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- New Zealand ranks 99th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.