Malta vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Malta
1.3%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
1.5%
in 2019
Malta rank
143rd
Sri Lanka rank
139th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Malta
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1.5% against 1.3% in Malta, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 143rd and Sri Lanka ranks 139th of 191 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Malta or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 1.5% against 1.3% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Malta and Sri Lanka?
- 0.2%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sri Lanka?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Malta ranks 143rd and Sri Lanka ranks 139th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.