Malaysia vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Malaysia
6.2%
in 2019
Peru
6.5%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
62nd
Peru rank
61st
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Malaysia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 6.5% against 6.2% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 62nd and Peru ranks 61st of 190 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Malaysia or Peru?
- Peru, at 6.5% against 6.2% in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Malaysia and Peru?
- 0.3%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Malaysia ranks 62nd and Peru ranks 61st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.