Israel vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Israel
3.6%
in 2019
East Timor
3.5%
in 2019
Israel rank
94th
East Timor rank
96th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Israel
- East Timor
How they compare
Israel currently reports 3.6% against 3.5% in East Timor, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was East Timor ahead.
Israel ranks 94th and East Timor ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Israel or East Timor?
- Israel, at 3.6% against 3.5% in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Israel and East Timor?
- 0.1%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and East Timor?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Israel and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Israel ranks 94th and East Timor ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.