Israel vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Israel
3.6%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3.4%
in 2019
Israel rank
94th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Israel
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Israel currently reports 3.6% against 3.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Israel ranks 94th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Israel or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Israel, at 3.6% against 3.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Israel ranks 94th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.