Hong Kong, China vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Hong Kong, China
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 1.2% against 1.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 148th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 146th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Hong Kong, China or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 1.2% against 1.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0.2%, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 148th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 146th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.