Hong Kong, China vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Hong Kong, China
1.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
1.0%
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
148th
Mauritius rank
148th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mauritius
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 148th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Hong Kong, China or Mauritius?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 148th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.