Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Guinea-Bissau
1.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
1.0%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
148th
Mauritius rank
148th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mauritius
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 148th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritius?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 148th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.