Guinea-Bissau vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Guinea-Bissau
1.0%
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
1.0%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
148th
Hong Kong, China rank
148th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 148th and Hong Kong, China ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Guinea-Bissau or Hong Kong, China?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Guinea-Bissau and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Hong Kong, China?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Hong Kong, China rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 148th and Hong Kong, China ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.