Estonia vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Estonia
1.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
1.0%
in 2019
Estonia rank
148th
Mauritius rank
148th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Estonia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.
Estonia ranks 148th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Estonia or Mauritius?
- Estonia, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Estonia and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Estonia ranks 148th and Mauritius ranks 148th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.