China vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
China
2.5%
in 2019
Latvia
2.4%
in 2019
China rank
120th
Latvia rank
122nd
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 2.5% against 2.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 120th and Latvia ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, China or Latvia?
- China, at 2.5% against 2.4% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between China and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- China ranks 120th and Latvia ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.