Chile vs El Salvador: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Chile
5.6%
in 2019
El Salvador
5.4%
in 2019
Chile rank
69th
El Salvador rank
71st
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 5.6% against 5.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 69th and El Salvador ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Chile or El Salvador?
- Chile, at 5.6% against 5.4% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Chile and El Salvador?
- 0.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Chile ranks 69th and El Salvador ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.