Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
5.0%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
5.1%
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
76th
Zimbabwe rank
74th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.1% against 5.0% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 191 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement fees, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.1% against 5.0% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement fees between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.