Thailand vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Thailand
67.91
in 2019
United Kingdom
68.69
in 2019
Thailand rank
37th
United Kingdom rank
34th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Thailand
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 68.69 against 67.91 in Thailand, a difference of 0.78.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 37th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Thailand or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 68.69 against 67.91 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Thailand and United Kingdom?
- 0.78, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and United Kingdom?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Thailand and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Thailand ranks 37th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.