Suriname vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Suriname
25.94
in 2019
East Timor
6.13
in 2019
Suriname rank
186th
East Timor rank
188th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Suriname
- East Timor
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 25.94 against 6.13 in East Timor, a difference of 19.81.
That makes Suriname's figure about 4.2 times East Timor's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 186th and East Timor ranks 188th of 188 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Suriname or East Timor?
- Suriname, at 25.94 against 6.13 in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Suriname and East Timor?
- 19.81, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Suriname ranks 186th and East Timor ranks 188th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.