South Africa vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

South Africa
56.88
in 2019
Uruguay
56.29
in 2019
South Africa rank
101st
Uruguay rank
103rd

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • South Africa
  • Uruguay
0204060201520172019

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 56.88 against 56.29 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.59.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Uruguay ahead.

South Africa ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, South Africa or Uruguay?
South Africa, at 56.88 against 56.29 in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between South Africa and Uruguay?
0.59, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
South Africa ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.