Slovakia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Slovakia
66.12
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
65.51
in 2019
Slovakia rank
46th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
49th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Slovakia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 66.12 against 65.51 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.61.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Slovakia ranks 46th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 49th of 188 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Slovakia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Slovakia, at 66.12 against 65.51 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Slovakia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.61, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Slovakia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Slovakia ranks 46th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 49th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.