San Marino vs Saint Lucia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

San Marino
59.25
in 2019
Saint Lucia
59.67
in 2019
San Marino rank
80th
Saint Lucia rank
78th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • San Marino
  • Saint Lucia
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 59.67 against 59.25 in San Marino, a difference of 0.42.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

San Marino ranks 80th and Saint Lucia ranks 78th of 188 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, San Marino or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 59.67 against 59.25 in San Marino as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between San Marino and Saint Lucia?
0.42, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Saint Lucia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do San Marino and Saint Lucia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
San Marino ranks 80th and Saint Lucia ranks 78th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.