San Marino vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
San Marino
59.25
in 2019
South Sudan
58.99
in 2019
San Marino rank
80th
South Sudan rank
83rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- San Marino
- South Sudan
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 59.25 against 58.99 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.26.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 80th and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, San Marino or South Sudan?
- San Marino, at 59.25 against 58.99 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between San Marino and South Sudan?
- 0.26, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- San Marino ranks 80th and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.