Samoa vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Samoa
58.59
in 2019
Tunisia
58.41
in 2019
Samoa rank
85th
Tunisia rank
87th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Samoa
- Tunisia
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 58.59 against 58.41 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Samoa or Tunisia?
- Samoa, at 58.59 against 58.41 in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Samoa and Tunisia?
- 0.18, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Samoa ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.