Rwanda vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Rwanda
69.11
in 2019
United Kingdom
68.69
in 2019
Rwanda rank
32nd
United Kingdom rank
34th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Rwanda
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 69.11 against 68.69 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.42.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Rwanda ranks 32nd and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 188 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Rwanda or United Kingdom?
- Rwanda, at 69.11 against 68.69 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Rwanda and United Kingdom?
- 0.42, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Kingdom?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Rwanda ranks 32nd and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.