Puerto Rico vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Puerto Rico
61.82
in 2019
Tanzania
61.66
in 2019
Puerto Rico rank
71st
Tanzania rank
72nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Puerto Rico
- Tanzania
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 61.82 against 61.66 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tanzania ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 71st and Tanzania ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Puerto Rico or Tanzania?
- Puerto Rico, at 61.82 against 61.66 in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Puerto Rico and Tanzania?
- 0.16, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Puerto Rico ranks 71st and Tanzania ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.