Portugal vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Portugal
67.91
in 2019
Sweden
67.61
in 2019
Portugal rank
38th
Sweden rank
39th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Portugal
  • Sweden
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 67.91 against 67.61 in Sweden, a difference of 0.3.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 39th of 188 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Portugal or Sweden?
Portugal, at 67.91 against 67.61 in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Portugal and Sweden?
0.3, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sweden?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Portugal and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Portugal ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 39th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.