Peru vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Peru
59.07
in 2019
South Sudan
58.99
in 2019
Peru rank
82nd
South Sudan rank
83rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Peru
- South Sudan
How they compare
Peru currently reports 59.07 against 58.99 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.08.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Peru or South Sudan?
- Peru, at 59.07 against 58.99 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Peru and South Sudan?
- 0.08, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Peru and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Peru ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.