Peru vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Peru
59.07
in 2019
San Marino
59.25
in 2019
Peru rank
84th
San Marino rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Peru
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 59.25 against 59.07 in Peru, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 84th and San Marino ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Peru or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 59.25 against 59.07 in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Peru and San Marino?
- 0.18, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Peru and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Peru ranks 84th and San Marino ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.