Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Papua New Guinea
36.21
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
35.62
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
173rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
174th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 36.21 against 35.62 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.59.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 173rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 174th of 190 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Papua New Guinea, at 36.21 against 35.62 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.59, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 173rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 174th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.