Oman vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Oman
61.87
in 2019
Tanzania
61.66
in 2019
Oman rank
68th
Tanzania rank
70th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Oman
- Tanzania
How they compare
Oman currently reports 61.87 against 61.66 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tanzania ahead.
Oman ranks 68th and Tanzania ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Oman or Tanzania?
- Oman, at 61.87 against 61.66 in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Oman and Tanzania?
- 0.21, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Oman and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Oman ranks 68th and Tanzania ranks 70th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.