Oman vs Paraguay: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Oman
61.87
in 2019
Paraguay
61.62
in 2019
Oman rank
68th
Paraguay rank
71st

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Oman
  • Paraguay
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Oman currently reports 61.87 against 61.62 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.25.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 68th and Paraguay ranks 71st of 188 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Oman or Paraguay?
Oman, at 61.87 against 61.62 in Paraguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Oman and Paraguay?
0.25, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Paraguay?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Oman and Paraguay rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Oman ranks 68th and Paraguay ranks 71st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.