New Zealand vs Turkey: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
New Zealand
71.48
in 2019
Turkey
71.4
in 2019
New Zealand rank
24th
Turkey rank
25th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Turkey
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 71.48 against 71.4 in Turkey, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 24th and Turkey ranks 25th of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Turkey?
- New Zealand, at 71.48 against 71.4 in Turkey as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Turkey?
- 0.08, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Turkey rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 24th and Turkey ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.