New Zealand vs Russia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
New Zealand
71.48
in 2019
Russia
72.18
in 2019
New Zealand rank
24th
Russia rank
22nd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 72.18 against 71.48 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 24th and Russia ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Russia?
- Russia, at 72.18 against 71.48 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Russia?
- 0.7, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Russia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Russia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 24th and Russia ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.