Nepal vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Nepal
45.99
in 2019
Sudan
47.84
in 2019
Nepal rank
149th
Sudan rank
146th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Nepal
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 47.84 against 45.99 in Nepal, a difference of 1.85.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 149th and Sudan ranks 146th of 188 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Nepal or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 47.84 against 45.99 in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Nepal and Sudan?
- 1.85, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Nepal ranks 149th and Sudan ranks 146th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.