Nepal vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Nepal
45.99
in 2019
Philippines
45.96
in 2019
Nepal rank
149th
Philippines rank
150th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Nepal
- Philippines
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 45.99 against 45.96 in Philippines, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Philippines ahead.
Nepal ranks 149th and Philippines ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Nepal or Philippines?
- Nepal, at 45.99 against 45.96 in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Nepal and Philippines?
- 0.03, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Nepal ranks 149th and Philippines ranks 150th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.