Myanmar vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Myanmar
26.39
in 2019
Suriname
25.94
in 2019
Myanmar rank
185th
Suriname rank
186th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Myanmar
- Suriname
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 26.39 against 25.94 in Suriname, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Suriname ahead.
Myanmar ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 186th of 188 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Myanmar or Suriname?
- Myanmar, at 26.39 against 25.94 in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Myanmar and Suriname?
- 0.45, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Myanmar ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 186th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.