Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Mozambique
39.78
in 2019
Zimbabwe
39.66
in 2019
Mozambique rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
170th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Mozambique
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 39.78 against 39.66 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.12.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mozambique or Zimbabwe?
- Mozambique, at 39.78 against 39.66 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 0.12, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Mozambique ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 170th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.