Mongolia vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Mongolia
61.36
in 2019
Tajikistan
60.71
in 2019
Mongolia rank
74th
Tajikistan rank
75th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Mongolia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 61.36 against 60.71 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.65.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Mongolia ranks 74th and Tajikistan ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Tajikistan?
- Mongolia, at 61.36 against 60.71 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Tajikistan?
- 0.65, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tajikistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Mongolia ranks 74th and Tajikistan ranks 75th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.