Mongolia vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
61.36
in 2019
Netherlands
59.94
in 2019
Mongolia rank
74th
Netherlands rank
77th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Netherlands
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 61.36 against 59.94 in Netherlands, a difference of 1.42.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Netherlands ahead.

Mongolia ranks 74th and Netherlands ranks 77th of 188 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Netherlands?
Mongolia, at 61.36 against 59.94 in Netherlands as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Netherlands?
1.42, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Netherlands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and Netherlands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 74th and Netherlands ranks 77th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.