Moldova vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Moldova
63.65
in 2019
Namibia
63.44
in 2019
Moldova rank
61st
Namibia rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Moldova
- Namibia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 63.65 against 63.44 in Namibia, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Moldova or Namibia?
- Moldova, at 63.65 against 63.44 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Moldova and Namibia?
- 0.21, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Moldova and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Moldova ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.