Mauritius vs United States: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Mauritius
72.22
in 2019
United States
73.44
in 2019
Mauritius rank
21st
United States rank
18th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 73.44 against 72.22 in Mauritius, a difference of 1.22.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 21st and United States ranks 18th of 188 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mauritius or United States?
- United States, at 73.44 against 72.22 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mauritius and United States?
- 1.22, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United States?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 21st and United States ranks 18th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.