Mauritius vs Russia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Mauritius
72.22
in 2019
Russia
72.18
in 2019
Mauritius rank
21st
Russia rank
22nd

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Russia
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 72.22 against 72.18 in Russia, a difference of 0.04.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Russia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 21st and Russia ranks 22nd of 188 countries.

Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mauritius or Russia?
Mauritius, at 72.22 against 72.18 in Russia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mauritius and Russia?
0.04, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Russia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Russia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Mauritius ranks 21st and Russia ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.