Mauritius vs Romania: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Mauritius
72.22
in 2019
Romania
72.25
in 2019
Mauritius rank
21st
Romania rank
20th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Romania
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Romania currently reports 72.25 against 72.22 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.03.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 21st and Romania ranks 20th of 188 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mauritius or Romania?
Romania, at 72.25 against 72.22 in Mauritius as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mauritius and Romania?
0.03, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Romania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Mauritius ranks 21st and Romania ranks 20th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.