Mauritania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Mauritania
65.99
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
65.51
in 2019
Mauritania rank
48th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
49th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 65.99 against 65.51 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mauritania ranks 48th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mauritania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritania, at 65.99 against 65.51 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.48, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Mauritania ranks 48th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.