Malta vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Malta
67.57
in 2019
Mexico
67.01
in 2019
Malta rank
41st
Mexico rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Malta
- Mexico
How they compare
Malta currently reports 67.57 against 67.01 in Mexico, a difference of 0.56.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 41st and Mexico ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malta or Mexico?
- Malta, at 67.57 against 67.01 in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malta and Mexico?
- 0.56, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Malta ranks 41st and Mexico ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.